Copyright and Digital Preservation
- "Reproduction" is the exclusive right of the copyright holder
[Sec 106(1)]
- "Public display" is an exclusive right of the copyright holder
[Sec 106(5)]
- Creating a "derivative work" is an exclusive right of the
copyright holder [Sec 106(2)]
- Library or Archive must be either open to the public or
allow access to non-affiliated researchers
- Copying cannot be for "direct or indirect commercial
advantage"
- The institution must own a legal copy of the original
item
- Every copy must carry a notice of copyright
- If the work is unpublished, preservation copies can be made for
the purpose of preservation or security
- If the work is published, preservation copies can be
made to replace an original that is "damaged, deteriorating,
lost, or stolen, or if the existing format in which the work is
stored has become obsolete."
- A format is
obsolete "if the machine or device necessary to render
perceptible a work stored in that format is no longer
manufactured or is no longer reasonably available in the
commercial marketplace."
- "The library or archives must also conduct
a reasonable investigation to confirm that an unused copy cannot
be obtained at a fair price."
- "If digital copies are made, access
to the digital version must be limited to the premises of the
library or archives."
- Audiovisual works are covered by this Section (unlike in the 1976
Act).
- Section 108 does not help libraries and archives preserve
materials that they do not own, such as
networked resources or Web sites. Nor does Section 108 apply to
an
individual who wants to preserve a digital file, even if they
have
legally acquired it.
- If all the above are met, the library or archive can make up to 3
copies of the work for preservation purposes [Sec 108 (b) & (c)]
- Digital copies can be made under this provision, but the digital
files cannot be "distributed in that format and ... not made available
to the public in that format outside the premises of the library or
archives". [Sec 108 (b) (2)]
- The law is less restrictive on limited distribution of
audiovisual news programs
Fair Use as a defense takes into consideration the following factors:
- (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such
use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
- (2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
- (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation
to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
- (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value
of the copyrighted work.
For preservation copying, an institution is likely in the clear for
factor #1. Factors #2 and #4 are likely to be fine for orphan or
marginal works, but might be challenged by the Content Industry for any
work that might have some potential commercial value. Factor #2
looks very troubling, but the library and archive communities have made
arguments to overcome this factor.
For a strong argument from the perspective of a librarian/lawyer, see
Mary Minow's How
I Learned to Love FAIR USE… or how to bring a $300,000 lawsuit down to
$0 if you're a library, archive, or nonprofit educational institution
- "A 'computer program' is a set of statements or instructions to
be used directly or indirectly in a computer in order to bring about a
certain result". [Sec 101]
- If you own a legal copy of a computer program, you can make an
archival copy if that's necessary to make it useable "in conjunction
with a machine".
- The new copy "is for archival purposes only" and must be
destroyed if your continued possession of it "should cease to be
rightful". [Sec 117 (a) (2)]
A good source for more information is Peter Hirtle's Digital
Preservation and Copyright